Good Practice in Archaeological Diagnostics : Non-Invasive Survey of Complex Archaeological Sites.
1. Verfasser: |
Corsi, Cristina.
|
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: |
Slapšak, Božidar.
Vermeulen, Frank. |
Ort/Verlag/Jahr: |
Cham :
Springer,
2014.
|
Ausgabe: | 1st ed. |
Umfang/Format: |
1 online resource (339 pages). |
Schriftenreihe: |
Natural science in archaeology
|
Schlagworte: | |
Parallelausgabe: |
Good Practice in Archaeological Diagnostics : Non-Invasive Survey of Complex Archaeological Sites (Print version:) |
Online Zugang: |
Available online |
Inhaltsangabe:
- Intro
- Contents
- 1: Good Practice in Archaeological Diagnostics: An Introduction
- 1.1 Making a 'Radiography' of the Past
- 1.2 Data Acquisition Versus Understanding
- 1.3 A Question of Integration
- 1.4 Size Matters
- 1.5 The Fourth Dimension
- References
- Part I: Remote Sensing
- 2: Aerial Photography in Archaeology
- 2.1 Historical Overview and Assessment
- 2.2 Aerial Photography Techniques
- 2.3 Principles of Archaeological Photo-Interpretation
- 2.4 Genesis and Classification of Archaeological Traces
- 2.4.1 Damp-Marks
- 2.4.2 Grass-Weed-Crop-Marks
- 2.4.3 Soil-Marks
- 2.4.4 Shadow Sites
- 2.4.5 Topographical Anomalies
- 2.4.6 Legacy Marks
- References
- 3: Undistorting the Past: New Techniques for Orthorectification of Archaeological Aerial Frame Imagery
- 3.1 Aerial Archaeological Frame Footage: An Introduction and Overview
- 3.1.1 One Hundred Years of Status Quo
- 3.1.2 The Vertical Debate
- 3.1.3 The Rise of the Unmanned Machines
- 3.1.4 The Mapping Paradigm
- 3.2 Aerial Frames Offer Deformed Views
- 3.2.1 (Digital) Aerial Images
- 3.2.2 Optical Distortions
- 3.2.3 Tilt Displacement
- 3.2.4 Relief Displacement
- 3.2.5 Georeferencing and Geometric Correction
- 3.3 A New Workflow
- 3.3.1 SfM + MVS Pipeline
- 3.3.1.1 Image Acquisition
- 3.3.1.2 Feature Detection
- 3.3.1.3 Feature Description
- 3.3.1.4 Descriptor Matching and Pairwise Image Orientation (Fundamental Matrices)
- 3.3.1.5 Triangulation
- 3.3.1.6 Bundle Adjustment
- 3.3.1.7 Defining a Coordinate Reference System
- 3.3.1.8 Dense Multi-view Stereo (MVS)
- 3.3.1.9 Georeferenced 3D Model and Orthophoto
- 3.3.2 Tools
- 3.3.2.1 Software
- 3.3.2.2 Hardware
- 3.4 Case Studies
- 3.4.1 Trea (Italy)
- 3.4.2 Kreuttal Region (Austria)
- 3.4.3 Pitaranha (Portugal-Spain)
- Conclusion
- References.
- 4: Roman Urban Survey: The Mapping and Monitoring of Complex Settlement Sites with Active Aerial Photography
- 4.1 Introduction: Surveying Abandoned Roman Towns
- 4.2 Discovery and Monitoring
- 4.3 Mapping, Interpretation and Integration
- 4.4 The Potenza Valley Towns from the Air
- Conclusion
- References
- 5: Integrated Approach for Archaeological Prospection Exploiting Airborne Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
- 5.1 Introduction
- 5.1.1 Overview of Remote Sensing for Archaeological Prospection
- 5.1.2 Background Literature on Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
- 5.2 Integrated Approach for Archaeological Prospection
- 5.2.1 Selinunte Archaeological Park
- 5.2.2 Mothia and Marsala Archaeological Areas
- 5.2.3 Arpi Archaeological Site
- 5.2.4 Albanian Archaeological Site
- 5.3 Integration Data, Results and Methodologies for Archaeological Prospection
- 5.3.1 Integration Data for Archaeological Prospection
- 5.3.2 Comparison and Appending of the Results for Archaeological Prospection
- 5.3.3 Exportation of the Characteristic Methods of Each Datum, Technique and Application for Employing with Other Datum, Techniques and Applications for Archaeological Prospection
- 5.4 Evaluation and Ranking the Results of Integrated Approach
- 5.4.1 Image Obtained by Integrated Approach
- 5.4.2 Methods to Evaluate and Rank the Image Obtained by the Integrated Approach
- 5.5 Results
- 5.5.1 The Quality of Images Collected by Each Sensor
- 5.5.2 The Capability of the Merged Images
- 5.5.3 The Capability of the Synthetic Images
- Conclusion
- References
- 6: Skin Deep: LiDAR and Good Practice of Landscape Archaeology
- 6.1 Introduction
- 6.2 What Do We Do?
- 6.3 LiDAR as an Inscription Device
- 6.4 LiDAR as Topography
- 6.5 How to Read Traces?
- 6.6 Time and Palimpsests
- Conclusion
- References.
- Part II: Geophysics
- 7: Magnetic Exploration of Archaeological Sites
- 7.1 A Basic Overview of a Magnetic Survey
- 7.2 Is the Archaeological Site Suitable for a Magnetic Survey?
- 7.3 Examples of Magnetic Surveys
- 7.4 Selecting a Magnetometer
- 7.5 Field Procedures
- 7.6 Data Processing and Display
- 7.7 Interpretation of Magnetic Maps
- 7.8 The Geophysical Report
- 7.9 Excavations
- 7.10 The Technical Side of Geophysics
- 7.11 Sources of Information
- References
- 8: Earth Resistance Survey: A Mature Archaeological Geophysics Method for Archaeology
- 8.1 Introduction
- 8.2 Principles of Earth Resistance Surveys
- 8.3 Typical Resistance Features in Classical Archaeology
- 8.4 Filters in Earth Resistance Interpretation
- 8.5 Future Developments of Earth Resistance Surveys
- References
- 9: Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR)
- 9.1 Brief Historical Review
- 9.2 Brief Note on Principle and Systems
- 9.3 Basic 3D Imaging
- 9.4 3D GPR Methodologies for Archaeological Prospection
- 9.4.1 Standard 3D Surveying or Pseudo 3D
- 9.4.2 Full-Resolution or True 3D or Ultradense 3D Surveying
- 9.4.3 Other Methodologies
- 9.4.4 Best Practices
- 9.5 Current State-of-the-Art Technology: Multichannel Array Systems
- Conclusions
- References
- 10: Interpretation and Guidelines for Reporting
- 10.1 Introduction
- 10.2 Interpretation of Geophysical Data
- 10.2.1 Basic Principles
- 10.2.2 A Priori Information
- 10.2.3 Magnetic Data
- 10.2.4 GPR Data
- 10.2.5 Electrical Resistivity Data
- 10.2.6 Typical Interpretation Pitfalls
- 10.3 Survey Reports
- 10.3.1 Structure of Survey Reports
- 10.3.2 Description of Methodology
- 10.3.3 Presentation of Survey Results
- 10.3.4 Data Archiving
- References
- Part III: Topographic and Geoarchaeological Surveys
- 11: Intra-site Artefact Surveys.
- 11.1 The Development of Survey Methodology
- 11.2 Collection Size
- 11.3 What Is Being Collected?
- 11.4 Ancillary Aids to Surface Ceramic Survey
- 11.5 Case Studies
- Conclusions
- References
- 12: Site Discovery and Evaluation Through Minimal Interventions: Core Sampling, Test Pits and Trial Trenches
- 12.1 Introduction
- 12.2 Minimal Interventions
- 12.3 Minimal Interventions and Site Discovery
- 12.3.1 Intersection Probability
- 12.3.2 Detection Probability
- 12.3.3 Optimal Strategies for Site Discovery
- 12.4 Minimal Interventions and Site Evaluation
- 12.5 Minimal Interventions and Non-invasive Techniques
- 12.5.1 Survey Techniques and Heritage Management Systems
- 12.5.2 Combining Invasive and Non-invasive Techniques: On the Way to Best Practice
- References
- 13: Creating and Analysing Digital Terrain Models for Archaeological Research
- 13.1 Digital Terrain Models: A Definition
- 13.2 Data Acquisition
- 13.2.1 Methods for Data Acquisition
- 13.2.1.1 Total Station
- 13.2.1.2 GNSS Receivers
- How Does It Work?
- 13.2.1.3 Digital Photogrammetry
- 13.2.1.4 Secondary Data Sources
- 13.2.2 Interpolation
- 13.2.2.1 Types of Interpolation Methods
- Raster Model Based
- Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW)
- Kriging
- Splines
- Vector Model Based
- Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN)
- Interpolation from Contour Lines
- 13.3 How Do We Use Models for Archaeological Research?
- References
- 14: The Geoarchaeological Approach
- 14.1 Introduction
- 14.2 The Rise of a Concept
- 14.3 General Principles of the Geoarchaeological Approach
- 14.4 In-Site and Off-Site Studies
- 14.5 Prior to Any Geoarchaeological Study
- 14.6 The Stages of the Geoarchaeological Approach
- 14.7 The Contribution of Geomorphology to the Geoarchaeological Approach
- Conclusion
- References.
- Part IV: Visualisation and Site Management
- 15: Implementing Best Practice in Cultural Heritage Visualisation: The London Charter
- 15.1 The London Charter for the Computer-Based Visualisation of Cultural Heritage (Version 2.1, 2009)
- 15.1.1 Preamble
- 15.1.2 Objectives
- 15.1.3 Principles
- 15.1.3.1 Principle 1: Implementation
- 15.1.3.2 Principle 2: Aims and Methods
- 15.1.3.3 Principle 3: Research Sources
- 15.1.3.4 Principle 4: Documentation
- Enhancing Practice
- Documentation of Knowledge Claims
- Documentation of Research Sources
- Documentation of Process (Paradata)
- Documentation of Methods
- Documentation of Dependency Relationships
- Documentation Formats and Standards
- 15.1.3.5 Principle 5: Sustainability
- 15.1.3.6 Principle 6: Access
- 15.2 Commentary on the London Charter
- 15.2.1 Preamble and Objectives
- 15.2.1.1 Principle 1: Implementation
- 15.2.1.2 Principle 2: Aims and Methods
- 15.2.1.3 Principle 3: Research Sources
- 15.2.1.4 Principle 4: Documentation
- 15.2.1.5 Principle 5: Sustainability
- 15.2.1.6 Principle 6: Access
- References
- 16: International Guidelines for Virtual Archaeology: The Seville Principles
- 16.1 Virtual Archaeology: Definition and Term
- 16.2 Historical Background to the Creation of an International Charter of Virtual Archaeology
- 16.3 Principles of the Charter
- 16.3.1 Principle 1: Interdisciplinarity
- 16.3.2 Principle 2: Purpose
- 16.3.3 Principle 3: Complementarity
- 16.3.4 Principle 4: Authenticity
- 16.3.5 Principle 5: Historical Rigour
- 16.3.6 Principle 6: Efficiency
- 16.3.7 Principle 7: Scientific Transparency
- 16.3.8 Principle 8: Training and Evaluation
- 16.4 Definitions
- References
- 17: Reconstructing Past Landscapes for Virtual Museums
- 17.1 Introduction
- 17.2 Uncertainty Towards Transparency.
- 17.2.1 Virtual Museums and Virtual Archaeology Survey.