|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
03201nam a2200373 u 4500 |
| 001 |
003007901 |
| 003 |
DE-2553 |
| 005 |
20220505153233.0 |
| 007 |
ta |
| 008 |
220203s2022 au ab r 001 0 eng d |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 978-3-7001-8449-2
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a BSA
|b eng
|c DE-2553
|d DE-2553
|e rda
|
| 041 |
0 |
|
|a eng
|a ger
|a fre
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Archaeology of Central Asia during the 1st millennium BC, from the beginning of the Iron Age to the Hellenistic period :
|b proceedings from the workshop held at the 10th ICAANE in Vienna, April 2016 /
|c Johanna Lhuillier (ed.).
|
| 264 |
|
|
|a Vienna :
|b Austrian Academy of Sciences,
|c 2021
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 150, [1] pages :
|b illustrations, maps (some coloured) ;
|c 30 cm.
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|2 rdacontent
|b txt
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a unmediated
|2 rdamedia
|b n
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a volume
|2 rdacarrier
|b nc
|
| 490 |
1 |
0 |
|a Oriental and European Archaeology (OREA)
|v 18
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Despite the recent advancements in our understanding of the socio-political history of the Eastern Iranian polity of Ancient Chorasmia at the height of its historical period, much work has yet to be done regarding its Iron Age andformative stages. The present-day archaeological endeavours in Uzbekistan/Karakalpakstan of the Karakalpak-Australian Expedition (KAE) and the Angka-kala Archaeological Expedition (AGKE – 2016) have clearly shown the necessity for a reassessment of the historical framework established long ago by the Soviet ‘Khorezm Expedition’(KhAEE). For instance, the role played by Chorasmia within the history of Zoroastrianism and the active participation of its elite(s) in the cultural milieu of Central Asia at all stages of its history have only recently started to be better understood. Still, the process of acculturation that occurred in Chorasmia from about the second half of the 6th century BC, inconnection with the Achaemenid power in Central Asian, seriously requires additional attention. This paper presents aconcise state of the art concerning the initial development of the Ancient Chorasmian society as a result of its inclusion into the sphere of influence of the Achaemenids, with focus on the two main sites excavated by the KhAEE relative tothis period: Kyuzeli-gȳr and Dingil’dzhe. In light of the available data, it appears that the indigenous cultures of the‘Southern Pre-Aral’ area during the 6th century BC took a clearly detectable course characterised by material culturalelements intertwined with the Persian politics in Central Asia.
|
| 546 |
|
|
|a Texts in English, German and French.
|
| 590 |
|
|
|a bsa0322
|
| 590 |
|
|
|a teher2022
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Antiquities, Prehistoric
|z Asia, Central.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Antiquities, Prehistoric
|z Black Sea Region
|
| 651 |
|
0 |
|a Asia, Central
|x Antiquities.
|
| 651 |
|
0 |
|a Black Sea Region
|x Antiquities.
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Lhuillier, Johanna
|e editor
|9 106195
|d 1982-
|
| 711 |
2 |
|
|a International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East
|9 96311
|n (10th :
|d 2016 :
|c Vienna, Austria)
|
| 830 |
|
0 |
|a Oriental and European Archaeology
|v 18
|
| 942 |
|
|
|2 z
|c BK
|
| 999 |
|
|
|c 3007901
|d 1411656
|
| 952 |
|
|
|0 0
|1 0
|2 z
|4 0
|6 IIALHU
|7 1
|9 864509
|R 2022-05-30 07:37:28
|a DAIT
|b DAIT
|i Teher/2022-32
|l 0
|o IIA-LHU
|p DAIT22040177
|r 2022-05-05
|v 120.00
|y BK
|
